Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Disciplines"
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*The disciplines are listed twice, which is quite chaotic. Can't we remove the lower part, which lists everything in the category 'Disciplines'. Or is this automatic?--[[User:EvilJonas|EvilJonas]] 08:54, 4 February 2008 (EST) | *The disciplines are listed twice, which is quite chaotic. Can't we remove the lower part, which lists everything in the category 'Disciplines'. Or is this automatic?--[[User:EvilJonas|EvilJonas]] 08:54, 4 February 2008 (EST) | ||
*The lower part is indeed generated automatically as this page is a "category". But the top list could be removed. --[[User:Zenjah|Zenjah]] 10:31, 4 February 2008 (EST) | *The lower part is indeed generated automatically as this page is a "category". But the top list could be removed. --[[User:Zenjah|Zenjah]] 10:31, 4 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | *But the Profession and Base Class page doesn't have the 'category list'.--[[User:EvilJonas|EvilJonas]] 10:50, 4 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:50, 4 February 2008
- Many of the discipline dropper locations are obsolete. It looks like new entries were added when they moved but the old entries were retained as well. It's spanking obvious when the microzone name does not match or the macrozone does not even exist anymore. Having two locations listed for one dropper is suggestive as well. --Vreejack 2006/09/29 2006
- The disciplines are listed twice, which is quite chaotic. Can't we remove the lower part, which lists everything in the category 'Disciplines'. Or is this automatic?--EvilJonas 08:54, 4 February 2008 (EST)
- The lower part is indeed generated automatically as this page is a "category". But the top list could be removed. --Zenjah 10:31, 4 February 2008 (EST)
- But the Profession and Base Class page doesn't have the 'category list'.--EvilJonas 10:50, 4 February 2008 (EST)
