Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Disciplines"

Revision as of 13:54, 4 February 2008

Many of the discipline dropper locations are obsolete. It looks like new entries were added when they moved but the old entries were retained as well. It's spanking obvious when the microzone name does not match or the macrozone does not even exist anymore. Having two locations listed for one dropper is suggestive as well. --Vreejack 2006/09/29 2006
The disciplines are listed twice, which is quite chaotic. Can't we remove the lower part, which lists everything in the category 'Disciplines'. Or is this automatic?--EvilJonas 08:54, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 17:42, 6 October 2006 (view source) Zenjah (talk \| contribs) m		Revision as of 13:54, 4 February 2008 (view source) EvilJonas (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*Many of the discipline dropper locations are obsolete. It looks like new entries were added when they moved but the old entries were retained as well. It's spanking obvious when the microzone name does not match or the macrozone does not even exist anymore. Having two locations listed for one dropper is suggestive as well. --Vreejack 2006/09/29 2006		*Many of the discipline dropper locations are obsolete. It looks like new entries were added when they moved but the old entries were retained as well. It's spanking obvious when the microzone name does not match or the macrozone does not even exist anymore. Having two locations listed for one dropper is suggestive as well. --Vreejack 2006/09/29 2006
		+	*The disciplines are listed twice, which is quite chaotic. Can't we remove the lower part, which lists everything in the category 'Disciplines'. Or is this automatic?--[[User:EvilJonas\|EvilJonas]] 08:54, 4 February 2008 (EST)