Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bodkin"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does this really need its own article? I think we may already have a few pages with large lists of each type of axe, great axe, and hammer, possibly. --[[User:RewenX|Rewen]] 21:20, 4 February 2008 (EST) | Does this really need its own article? I think we may already have a few pages with large lists of each type of axe, great axe, and hammer, possibly. --[[User:RewenX|Rewen]] 21:20, 4 February 2008 (EST) | ||
:Do we? I thought we had some incomplete info on the weapons in-game, such as axes, but no swords, etc... --[[User:Halethrain|Halethrain]] 21:25, 4 February 2008 (EST) | :Do we? I thought we had some incomplete info on the weapons in-game, such as axes, but no swords, etc... --[[User:Halethrain|Halethrain]] 21:25, 4 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | ::I think | + | ::I think Axes was a more organized way to present this information. A seperate article for each weapon seems like a lot of extra work and some uninteresting "random article" browses (my opinion). |
:::Can't really disagree that a single page is better per weapon category, but I'm still happy to see any entry for the weapons versus none :P --[[User:Halethrain|Halethrain]] 21:57, 4 February 2008 (EST) | :::Can't really disagree that a single page is better per weapon category, but I'm still happy to see any entry for the weapons versus none :P --[[User:Halethrain|Halethrain]] 21:57, 4 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | ::::It seemed to make sense when I was creating articles for class weapons, then I just continued to the regular ones. It did occur to me that the | + | ::::It seemed to make sense when I was creating articles for class weapons, then I just continued to the regular ones. It did occur to me that the Axes page might be a better way to do it... When I get the time I'll switch these individual articles to lists of weapons by category. --[[User:Zenjah|Zenjah]] 11:06, 7 February 2008 (EST) |
:::::A while back, Ashen mentioned something about changing weapon percents, speed, and damage types so that there are far more weapon with 100% for more variety (even though they are making vorgrim items with FC-like enchantments so now everyone will use those anyway lol) so it might be better to hold off on this until they're finished with this patch? I just don't want to see anyone do all this editing just to have it change a week later! --[[User:RewenX|Rewen]] 21:24, 7 February 2008 (EST) | :::::A while back, Ashen mentioned something about changing weapon percents, speed, and damage types so that there are far more weapon with 100% for more variety (even though they are making vorgrim items with FC-like enchantments so now everyone will use those anyway lol) so it might be better to hold off on this until they're finished with this patch? I just don't want to see anyone do all this editing just to have it change a week later! --[[User:RewenX|Rewen]] 21:24, 7 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::::::Ashen isn't with SBG anymore, he's was Bioware, Austin. I think Xanther is going to be the SB go-to guy henceforth. --[[User:Halethrain|Halethrain]] 21:27, 7 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:58, 9 January 2010
Does this really need its own article? I think we may already have a few pages with large lists of each type of axe, great axe, and hammer, possibly. --Rewen 21:20, 4 February 2008 (EST)
- Do we? I thought we had some incomplete info on the weapons in-game, such as axes, but no swords, etc... --Halethrain 21:25, 4 February 2008 (EST)
- I think Axes was a more organized way to present this information. A seperate article for each weapon seems like a lot of extra work and some uninteresting "random article" browses (my opinion).
- Can't really disagree that a single page is better per weapon category, but I'm still happy to see any entry for the weapons versus none :P --Halethrain 21:57, 4 February 2008 (EST)
- I think Axes was a more organized way to present this information. A seperate article for each weapon seems like a lot of extra work and some uninteresting "random article" browses (my opinion).
- It seemed to make sense when I was creating articles for class weapons, then I just continued to the regular ones. It did occur to me that the Axes page might be a better way to do it... When I get the time I'll switch these individual articles to lists of weapons by category. --Zenjah 11:06, 7 February 2008 (EST)
- A while back, Ashen mentioned something about changing weapon percents, speed, and damage types so that there are far more weapon with 100% for more variety (even though they are making vorgrim items with FC-like enchantments so now everyone will use those anyway lol) so it might be better to hold off on this until they're finished with this patch? I just don't want to see anyone do all this editing just to have it change a week later! --Rewen 21:24, 7 February 2008 (EST)
- Ashen isn't with SBG anymore, he's was Bioware, Austin. I think Xanther is going to be the SB go-to guy henceforth. --Halethrain 21:27, 7 February 2008 (EST)
- A while back, Ashen mentioned something about changing weapon percents, speed, and damage types so that there are far more weapon with 100% for more variety (even though they are making vorgrim items with FC-like enchantments so now everyone will use those anyway lol) so it might be better to hold off on this until they're finished with this patch? I just don't want to see anyone do all this editing just to have it change a week later! --Rewen 21:24, 7 February 2008 (EST)
- It seemed to make sense when I was creating articles for class weapons, then I just continued to the regular ones. It did occur to me that the Axes page might be a better way to do it... When I get the time I'll switch these individual articles to lists of weapons by category. --Zenjah 11:06, 7 February 2008 (EST)
