Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bodkin"
Halethrain (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Do we? I thought we had some incomplete info on the weapons in-game, such as axes, but no swords, etc... --[[User:Halethrain|Halethrain]] 21:25, 4 February 2008 (EST) | :Do we? I thought we had some incomplete info on the weapons in-game, such as axes, but no swords, etc... --[[User:Halethrain|Halethrain]] 21:25, 4 February 2008 (EST) | ||
::I think [[Axes]] was a more organized way to present this information. A seperate article for each weapon seems like a lot of extra work and some uninteresting "random article" browses (my opinion). | ::I think [[Axes]] was a more organized way to present this information. A seperate article for each weapon seems like a lot of extra work and some uninteresting "random article" browses (my opinion). | ||
| + | :::Can't really disagree that a single page is better per weapon category, but I'm still happy to see any entry for the weapons versus none :P --[[User:Halethrain|Halethrain]] 21:57, 4 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:57, 5 February 2008
Does this really need its own article? I think we may already have a few pages with large lists of each type of axe, great axe, and hammer, possibly. --Rewen 21:20, 4 February 2008 (EST)
- Do we? I thought we had some incomplete info on the weapons in-game, such as axes, but no swords, etc... --Halethrain 21:25, 4 February 2008 (EST)
- I think Axes was a more organized way to present this information. A seperate article for each weapon seems like a lot of extra work and some uninteresting "random article" browses (my opinion).
- Can't really disagree that a single page is better per weapon category, but I'm still happy to see any entry for the weapons versus none :P --Halethrain 21:57, 4 February 2008 (EST)
- I think Axes was a more organized way to present this information. A seperate article for each weapon seems like a lot of extra work and some uninteresting "random article" browses (my opinion).
